Feed on
Posts
Comments

“East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet”, wrote Rudyard Kipling in the poem “The Ballad of East and West”.

Non-profit is non-profit, and for profit is for profit, and never the twain shall meet – or should they? Maybe they already do!

There is an on-going discussion in the Business as Mission movement about “real business”, “fake business”, “propped up business”, “sustainable business”. This conversation is important. But sometimes it becomes heavy with ideological purists who see no connection between non-profit and for profit. Mission is mission and business is business. Some even state that there mustn’t be any connection: “Business is business and businesses carry their own costs”. But do they? Is that really what the business world in general looks like?

Let’s first acknowledge that there are differences between NGOs, mission organizations, churches and other non-profits on the one hand, and businesses on the other.

They operate with different paradigms, they are different legal entities, they have different modus operandi, and they demand some different skill-sets.

But from a Biblical perspective church and business are also very close. The purpose of the church is to glorify God, serve people, and meet various needs. The church is a non-profit entity. Business from a Biblical perspective should also glorify God, serve people, and meet various needs. But businesses exist to make a profit – but not exclusively.

Are they mutually exclusive? Should a real business never receive free money, free advice, or pro-bono workers? This begs the question as to what “real” business is. The assumption that real businesses are self-sustaining does not give a full picture of the eco-system in which businesses operate. The Economist, which also uses the term eco-system, has a very enlightening article dealing with this in the Oct 8 issue: “A helping hand for start-ups.

They write about one major initiative – originating from the corporate world – which gives FREE support services to business people, worth USD 730 million. Is that wrong? Is that skewing businesses? No, these kinds of pro-bono work and subsidies happen all the time in “real” businesses, in the market place.

Why should we in the BAM world be afraid of setting up systems of people volunteering their time which can help BAM companies to start and grow?

We have, in the Western world, “real businesses” which receive tax breaks, bail-outs, investment incentives, SME economy building subsidies, etc… How many family businesses, in both the rich and the poor world, do not have family members pitching in for free?

Is it wrong to help BAM businesses for free – to a certain degree – in various ways in the Arab world and Asia?

No business is self-sustaining. Nothing is – not even the church. The only self sustaining entity is God. The creation and every human being derives from God, is created by him. What we have and what we are comes as a gift – it is free.

People in business use free gifts – donations – to start and grow businesses. Gifts like an entrepreneurial eye and a business acumen. Businesses use other gifts from God like iron ore and water. All God-given subsidies as it were.

This does not mean that we should confuse non-profit and for profit, or that we should be sloppy business people hoping for bail-outs. No, the business of business is business, and that includes making a profit, and having a good social, environmental and spiritual impact.

But we shouldn’t be judgmental if somebody mentors a company for free. Why should we criticize a business owner who doesn’t draw a full salary from the company because he or she has other income streams?

In the business eco-system there are subsidies, tax-breaks and pro-bono work. These incentives from government, from the corporate world and from NGOs, can help build healthy growing business. It would be wrong to discard a business – including BAM businesses – just because it draws on free advice or uses tax breaks.

Non-profit is non-profit, and for profit is for profit, and never the twain shall meet? Wrong, they do meet and these meetings can be profitable – in the wider sense – for people, businesses, communities and nations.

Tags:

Tuesday October 18 is the European day highlighting the issue of human trafficking – modern day slavery. It is a global tragedy and it affects millions of people.

A few facts:

  • An estimated 120,000 women and children are trafficked into Western Europe each year; 90% of victims trafficked into European Union member states end up in the sex industry.
  • Eastern Europe has been called a ‘frontier of failure in the battle against human trafficking’.
  • It is not migrant labor or exploited labor in general. It is people who are abused and who are not free to leave.

In a previous blog entry I wrote about this big and organized crime – How to tackle organized crime. We need to create critical mass of people and organizations to fight this evil and to help the victims. The European Freedom Network (EFN) is such a response.

EFN just launched its website: European Freedom Network

They have a prayer guide which I encourage you to read, use and share.

Why should we support and join EFN? Strategic alliances and networks are important for many reasons. Let me give you some food for thought, some teasers:

  • An African proverb says: if you want to walk fast – walk alone. If you want to walk far – walk together.
  • Do we want to be a sparkler or a light house? One is short lived; one is there for the long haul. One is easy to start; the other one takes more joint efforts and organization. One is sparkling fun for a brief moment; one is a guiding light, saving many year after year.
  • Why are airlines creating strategic alliances? They can serve more people, give better services, and fly more people to more destinations.
  • What are we as Christians to do with Christ’s prayer about visible and practical unity?

***************************************************************************

PS: My wife Jennifer is a part of the leadership of EFN. Click here for her blog. If you want to receive her newsletter, please send her an email: [email protected]

Jennifer’s latest newsletter is presenting unique opportunities for people to support strategic anti-trafficking initiatives.

Tags: ,

There are an increasing number of publications (books, articles, papers) on Business as Mission, BAM. Many are authored by Westerners from a Western perspective and these contributions are good and helpful. But it is not a fair reflection of the global BAM movement, since probably most practitioners and many thought leaders are non-Westerners or run BAM businesses in the Arab world and Asia.

Thus it was a joy to be a special editor for the BAM issue of the Connections Journal two years ago and invite friends and colleagues from all over the world to contribute. The journal contains articles on Business as Mission from thought leaders and practitioners from Asia, Africa, Latin America, Europe and North America.

You can find the link to these articles under “LINKS”; scroll down and look right: WEA-MC Journal Connections, BAM issue, fall 2009

The articles include:

  • Case Study on BAM SME from Korea to Other Parts of Asia. Joseph Lee
  • Restoring People, Changing Businesses, Transforming Societies – A Case Study from Indonesia. Julian Foe
  • The Challenges and Opportunities For Business As Mission: A Perspective From Africa. Dennis Tongoi
  • Bossa Nova, the “Beautiful Game” and Business as Mission (A Brazilian Perspective). João Mordomo
  • Larger-Sized Business as Mission (BAM) Companies. (Chinese Perspectives) Dwight Nordstrom & Vince Liang
  • Why Is Bangladesh Poor and Taiwan Rich? Mats Tunehag & Peter Shaukat
  • Business as Mission: Towards a Biblical and Practical Theology of Work and Business. Bridget Adams
  • Church, Missions and Business: Roles, Responsibilities, Tension and Synergies. Peter Shaukat
  • Human Trafficking: Business as Prevention and Restoration. Jennifer Roemhildt Tunehag
  • Ten Principles: BAM in areas of Prostitution and Trafficking. Annie Dieselberg
  • The Experiment in Integrated Mission – Business, Mission, and Social Transformation. Trev Gregory
  • The Mission of Business: CSR+. Mats Tunehag
  • Chickens, computers, and steel parts – Why business-based ministry is so effective. Matt in Asia
  • The Business as Mission Manifesto

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Underlying values often surface in legislation. The value of life is secondary or tertiary in California, while skin health seemingly is of primary value.

In California minors can have an abortion without the knowledge or consent of parents.  California has rejected three times efforts to allow parents to be notified when a minor girl is considering an abortion.

But a new law prohibits teens to use tanning beds. Age limit is now 18 years. It used to be that 14 – 18 year olds could get this kind of tan with the parents’ approval. But no more! According to the Governor’s office the legislation was designed to “improve the health and well-being of Californians”.

The same legislators often use the hollow argument that women – and even teenage girls – have the “right to their own body” and thus abortion. The new law means that teens don’t have the right to their own body for tanning purposes, but they do for abortion.

So tanning beds are potentially harmful for teens, and are thus now banned for this age group. Abortion on the other hand, is seen as relatively harmless for teens. No consideration of abortion syndrome – or the unborn.

Skin is more important than life. Can a society with such values prosper, or even survive?

Tags: , , ,

The Arab spring has turned into a chilly winter, especially for the Christians. The Egypt security forces killed at least 24 Christians who were demonstrating against the discrimination of Christians, against the burning of churches, against the slandering of Christians on state television, et cetera.

Now let me guess what will not happen next:

  • There won’t be an extra emergency session of the UN Security Council.
  • No UN commission will be appointed to investigate the actions of the Egyptian security forces.
  • There won’t be any demands of boycotts against Egypt.
  • Turkey will not downgrade its diplomatic relations with Egypt.
  • The Arab League will not make any statement criticizing the persecution of Christians in Egypt.
  • There will be no need for extra security measures of Egyptian embassies around the world because there will be no Christian suicide bombers or mobs attacking them.

But maybe I am wrong…

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »